Mapping
Research
Theory of Change
Impact > Simplified
Evaluation
Evidence
Insights
Reflections, opinions, explainers, related to evaluation.
You don’t have to know anything about evaluation to understand the content.
Have a cuppa, read an article, let me know what you think.
They spent two years finding out something ‘didn't work’. That’s great news.
A two-year study. Three universities. Randomised controlled trials. And the result?
The intervention didn't work. But that isn’t the end of the story.
Is this car ‘good’…?
Evaluation can be about assessing the value of something. But value isn’t just one thing. Understanding this has implications for what we evaluate, and the ethics behind it.
So, let me explain it simply, by asking “is this car good?”.
Evaluation on a budget: 7 things to consider
Budgets for evaluation are being slashed. I’ve seen this first hand in Higher Education Institutions, and I’m betting it’s happening elsewhere too.
But the need for measuring impact and evaluative work remains. So what is the solution?
Creating a Theory of Change is like writing a pop banger [Crosspost > TASO]
Last month I wrote a guest article for TASO about how to write a Theory of Change using their Mapping Outcome and Activities Tools (MOATs).
In it, I described how writing a Theory of Change in some ways is like writing a pop song.
For me, evaluation is part art, part science.